(Toute cette caste occidentale corrompue éthiquement qui traite le peuple comme un ennemi alors que c'est ce même peuple qui les a élu à leur fonction. A moins qu'ils ne considèrent que sans lui, ils auraient de toute façon été élus. Ce qui pose une autre question, "Quand vont-ils se décider à supprimer les élections pour les remplacer par un système de cooptation entre-eux. Ce qui se pratique déjà officieusement, genre, seuls les grands électeurs ont le droit de voter, ce qui était d'usage me semble-t-il au début du 19ème siècle. A la fin du 18ème siècle le niveau de la fortune donnait le droit de voter en France, ce que les anglais appellent la chambre des lords. note de rené)
Watch: Mitt Romney Argues That It Shouldn't Be Illegal For Government To Use Big Tech For Censorship (USA)
Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,
During a Senate hearing Wednesday, Mitt Romney argued against an amendment proposed by Rand Paul to make it illegal for government to use social media and big tech companies to censor the views of Americans.
Paul put forth the case that “the First Amendment really isn’t about protecting the speech of government workers the First Amendment says Congress shall make no law it’s about limitations on government involvement with speech.”
Paul continued, “if Twitter says bad things about me and puts up bad things and takes me down I have no recourse against Twitter, same with Facebook. I’m mad, I hate that YouTube has taken my speeches down I don’t do business with them anymore, because I think they’re bigoted, biased and wrong-headed on this.”
“As far as threats, what we do know from the Twitter files is that the government was making threats,” Paul continued, adding “there were threats of Anti-Trust action against the companies if they didn’t take the material down, there was also threats of we will remove your 230 protection. Section 230 gives them liability protection and there were overt threats and threats in writing basically saying if you don’t take this down you know your 230 protection of liability could go away.”
“I think the government should be absolutely prohibited without question. I think it should be as Draconian as you probably can make it,” Paul continued, adding “things that are an opinion, the government has no business in this.”
Romney disagreed with him, claiming that individuals within the government should have the right to stop social media companies or legacy media companies from putting out content that is “wrong”.
Romney stated “To say that no employee of the government from the president on down to that millions of people who work in the government can speak with a social media company or a Legacy Media Company and express their point of view that an article is wrong or that Avenue they’re going down is wrong, that would shut off free speech.”
Watch:
The debate comes on the heels of a Federal Judge issuing a recent injunction to put a stop to the Biden Administration acting like an “Orwellian Ministry Of Truth” by colluding with big tech to censor opinions it doesn’t like, much to the disliking of the establishment media.
* * *
Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here. Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
Also, we urgently need your financial support here.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire