vendredi 20 février 2026

#NRA 73 : Affaire Epstein, Trump, Macron, Lecornu, ex-Prince Andrew, Bill Gates. (France)

227 k abonnés

https://www.youtube.com/live/nOmN3prLCKo?si=mpvY1qdyl8fx4UyJ

(Ils font semblant de s'auto-fiancer ensemble, trois petits tours et puis s'en vont. note de rené)

Nvidia Favors $30 Billion OpenAI Investment, Retreating From Prior $100 Billion Commitment

Update (Friday):

Bloomberg reported earlier this week that OpenAI is nearing completion of a new funding round that could raise more than $100 billion. Separately, the Financial Times reported on Thursday that Nvidia is close to finalizing an investment of about $30 billion in OpenAI, a significantly smaller amount than the $100 billion commitment agreed upon last year.

FT cited people familiar with the funding round who said the "final stages" have begun and that Nvidia's $30 billion equity investment in OpenAI could be completed as early as this weekend.

The downsized investment from Nvidia tears up the $100 billion commitment the companies unveiled last September, described as a "letter of intent" but never moved from an MOU to a formal agreement.

Nvidia's investment is part of a larger funding round that is set to raise $100 billion for OpenAI and value it at around $730 billion. Bloomberg stated earlier this week that, besides Nvidia, other investors, including SoftBank Group, Amazon, and Microsoft, were participating in the deal.

OpenAI is expected to recycle much of the fresh capital into Nvidia chips, helping fund more data center buildouts and expand new compute capacity measured in gigawatts.

Investor fears about the AI trade unwinding, private credit, and other market rumblings have emerged, with the Nasdaq trending sideways since peaking in late October. We have raised concerns about the "circular jerk" nature of the Nvidia-OpenAI deals.

* * *

OpenAI's private valuation could soon top $850 billion, as the first tranche of a new funding round is expected to raise more than $100 billion, giving the ChatGPT maker fresh powder for additional infrastructure spending and faster development of its AI tools, Bloomberg reported.

People familiar with the fundraising told the outlet that the ChatGPT maker's valuation could exceed $850 billion, with a reported pre-money valuation of $730 billion.

The first phase of the funding round is being led by Amazon, SoftBank Group, Nvidia, and Microsoft, with allocations potentially finalized by the end of this month.

A second phase of funding could include venture firms, sovereign wealth funds, and other investors, potentially pushing the total fundraising even higher.

UBS analyst Aditi Samajpati told clients earlier that OpenAI's new funding round "highlights the escalating capital intensity of AI development and deepening strategic alignment between OpenAI and Big Tech."

Bloomberg hedged the report by indicating the "deal is not yet finalized and the details could change."

Shares of SoftBank, which held an 11% stake in OpenAI as of December, jumped as much as 4% on the news during Tokyo trading. Shares closed up 2.6% and have remained flat year-to-date after peaking in October 2025.

OpenAI's potentially stunning private-market valuation comes after Anthropic was valued at about $350 billion in its latest Series G funding round led by GIC and Coatue.

Markets are pricing in a world in which US AI giants capture an outsized share of global AI revenue, control the highest-margin layers of the stack, and retain pricing power as customers continue to pay up. The key risk we see is duration in the AI story, and this may be a harder narrative to maintain as the technological gap between US and Chinese AI models narrows.

Le maire de Londres, Khan, sous le feu des critiques après les révélations de la BBC sur l'ampleur des réseaux de pédocriminels.

Le maire de Londres avait précédemment déclaré qu'il n'y avait « aucune indication » de l'existence de réseaux de pédophiles du même type que ceux observés dans les villes du nord , mais une enquête de la BBC a mis au jour une exploitation généralisée dans la capitale...

London Mayor Khan Under Fire As BBC Exposes Scale Of Grooming Gangs

uthored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,

London Mayor Sadiq Khan is facing renewed criticism after a major BBC investigation found that vulnerable girls as young as 14 are being lured into forced sex by gangs operating across the capital.

The investigation, based on weeks of reporting and interviews with dozens of people, including five survivors of gang-based violence, concluded that exploitation by organised groups is rife in parts of London.

Some victims told the BBC they were raped by multiple men as “payment” for unpaid drug debts run up by gangs that controlled them. Others said they had been groomed solely for sex. The investigation also found that girls were often drawn into criminal activity such as drug dealing, weapons trading, and phone theft before being sexually exploited.

One Metropolitan Police officer described young girls and women as the “lowest rung” within gang hierarchies, saying they were groomed and exploited “for everything.”

Public debate over grooming gangs in the U.K. has often focused on northern towns such as Rotherham and Rochdale. A government-commissioned report last year found that in Greater Manchester, South Yorkshire, and West Yorkshire, there was evidence of “disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds amongst suspects for group-based child sexual exploitation.”

Further investigations have found the same in other towns and cities, including Telford, Oxford, Derby, Birmingham, Halifax, Peterborough, and countless others.

Last year, Khan said there was no “indication of […] grooming gangs” of the type seen in Rotherham operating in London. Following the BBC findings, a spokesperson for the mayor said he wanted to support police to tackle “all child sexual exploitation in the capital, including grooming gangs.”

Survivors told the broadcaster how exploitation often targeted girls from broken homes or troubled backgrounds.

“I didn’t feel like I was groomed or exploited. I didn’t think I was a victim. It’s taken me a while to realise I was used and manipulated,” one victim told the BBC.

Another survivor, Milly, said she was 15 when she was passed between different men.

“I was getting passed around different men every night – sometimes 10 or 15 a month,” she said, describing how she was plied with drink and drugs before being taken into bedrooms by different men.

“I don’t remember their names really. It sounds horrible, but I just know they were Asian. Sometimes they just said, ‘Oh, you’re a nice, young White girl,'” she added.

A third victim, Ruth, said: “They didn’t want anything but sex. I was low and they gave me expensive things so I felt wanted and then slept with them. It felt like I had multiple boyfriends giving me attention.”

Detective Sergeant John Knox, head of the Metropolitan Police child exploitation team in Lambeth and Southwark, said girls inside gangs “cannot say no to sex.”

“Within that gang world, the girls are at the lowest rung and they have to do as they’re told. And that includes sexually,” he said, adding that if a girl cannot refuse, “she’s being raped and that’s how we look at it as the police.”

Knox estimates at least 60 children in his south London area are currently being exploited by gangs, some as young as 13.

The BBC findings prompted sharp criticism from political opponents.

Susan Hall, leader of the Conservatives in the London Assembly, said the report was “shocking” and accused the mayor of dismissing concerns.

Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy wrote that the mayor had claimed there were no rape gangs in London and that “everyone knew that was nonsense.”

Last month, Hall pressed the mayor on whether grooming gangs were operating in London and called for funding for a dedicated inquiry. She accused Khan of previously dismissing her concerns, telling him, “I asked if we had grooming gangs in London. You dismissed my question by saying you didn’t know what I meant. I have to tell you, the rape victims knew exactly what I was talking about.”

Hall urged the mayor to apologize to victims who, she said, felt their experiences had been downplayed.

Khan refused to concede the point, replying during the exchange that the issue was too serious to “play party politics.”

Previously, he argued that the “specific type of systemic cases” seen in some northern towns were not the same as the more “complex” patterns of exploitation in London, refusing to acknowledge that the phenomenon of Asian grooming gangs raping White girls as seen across many U.K. cities was not prevalent on the London scene.

In October, the Metropolitan Police announced it will re-examine at least 1,200 child sexual exploitation cases following a national review, and previously confirmed it was reviewing 9,000 cases spanning 15 years.

An independent inquiry into grooming gangs chaired by Baroness Longfield is expected to begin later this year, with the Home Office stating it will have full powers to compel evidence and conduct local investigations.

Read more here...A

Justice insaisissable face à la COVID : où sont les poursuites ?

Par Armageddon Prose

Aucune poursuite, aucune enquête, aucun communiqué de presse.

Elusive COVID Justice: Where Are the Prosecutions?

Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

A year and change into the Golden Age — a deep, and thus far unquenched, thirst for justice among a huge portion of the MAGA base notwithstanding — the administration has prosecuted precisely zero COVID criminals.

What’s more, the Department of Justice, when Pam Bondi isn’t promising to prosecute Americans for “hate speech” or rolling out new schemes to cover up the Epstein, hasn’t scrounged up the time or energy to bother even investigating any of them.

No prosecutions, no investigations, no press releases.

Nothing but radio silence.

The guy running HHS, RFK Jr. wrote a big, beautiful book elaborately detailing the rampant criminality of Fauci and many, many of his co-conspirators.

And yet, nothing.

Rather, AG Pam Bondi seems far more interested in prosecuting phantom “hate speech” crimes and covering up for the Epstein class.

Were she inclined to do the job the base that put her in office would like her to do, however, she would have a plethora of legal implements at her disposal.

It is true that, for some federal crimes that these people likely committed — and we’re only discussing federal crimes, setting aside state-level statutes under which these people could be targeted — the statute of limitations has run its course and the window for prosecution has elapsed, being over six years out since the start of the pandemic and even longer from the pre-planning (the tabletop exercise Event 201 coincidentally timed in October 2019, just a few months before the lockdowns began, the illicit gain-of-function work on coronaviruses in offshore labs, etc.).

Criminal conspiracy — which these people provably engaged in — typically has a five-year statute of limitations.

The key provision, though, is that the clock on the five-year statute of limitations window for criminal conspiracy only commences once the conspiracy has concluded.

As the conspiracy — the shot mandates, the forced masking, the business closures etc. — arguably continued deep into 2023 and arguably even beyond, we’d still be well within the five-year window for prosecution.

Via Department of Justice (emphasis added):

“Conspiracy is a continuing offense. For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).
An individual’s “withdrawal” from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986).”

-----------------------------------------

[If you appreciate Armageddon Prose, please consider a $5/month or $50/year Substack subscription or a one-time digital “coffee” donation. For alternative means of patronage, email benbartee@protonmail.com.]

------------------------------------------

So, who should the Department of Justice be investigating, assuming it was serious about pursuing justice?

A short but wildly incomplete list to start with:

· Anthony Fauci. The head of the snake. See: Help Get This Simple Fauci Prosecution Playbook to Trump, Please

· Peter Daszak. Former EcoHealth Alliance who acted as the conduit through which Fauci funneled NIAID funding to the Wuhan lab (after the Obama administration outlawed gain-of-function on American soil)

· Deborah Birx. The so-called “Scarf Lady” who ran the Trump White House response (into the ground)

· Peter Morens. Fauci’s capo at the NIAID, whom he used as a go-between to illegally skirt FOIA record-keeping requirements. (Morens admitted as much in Congressional testimony, under oath.)

· Francis Collins. Head of NIH during and before COVID

· Rochelle Walensky. Head of CDC during COVID

· Mandy Cohen. Walensky’s replacement, caught on camera gleefully explaining how she arbitrarily enforced COVID lockdowns on the public with no scientific basis. See: Biden Pick for New CDC Director Laughs About Arbitarily Enforcing COVID Lockdowns

Entire books can, and in some cases have, been written about each of these seedy characters, whose depravity stretches far further back in time than COVID; indeed, their lack of morals or decency was the qualifying features that catapulted them to the top of the Public Health™ apparatus in the first place.

None of these people, for the record, benefitted from the flurry of pardons issued by whoever was running the Biden autopen on his way out the door, with the exception of Anthony Fauci. And even Fauci’s pardon, if indeed if was signed via autopen as it appears to have been, is highly suspect.

All of which is to say: there is no excuse for the total lack of effort to punish these demons who perpetrated the greatest scam in world history and killed untold millions of people, and perhaps billions in the aggregate, in the process.

Benjamin Bartee, author of Broken English Teacher: Notes From Exile (now available in paperback), is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist with opposable thumbs.

Follow AP on X.

Subscribe (for free) to Armageddon Prose and its dystopian sister, Armageddon Safari.

Support AP’s independent journalism with a one-off, hassle-free “digital coffee” tip.

Bitcoin public address: bc1qvq4hgnx3eu09e0m2kk5uanxnm8ljfmpefwhawv

20 février 2026

/Réseau International

/16 Comments

Accusations de désinformation : plus de 150 ex-diplomates mettent en cause le chef de la diplomatie française

Imprimer

Pdf

Soutenez-nous
Votre soutien nous est indispensable pour continuer à vous fournir le meilleur de l’information internationale alternative. C’est grâce à vos dons que nous pourrons maintenir le cap pour une information plurielle et réellement alternative. Nous comptons sur vous.
Participer

par Amir Ahamada

Plus de 150 anciens diplomates, ministres et ambassadeurs ont accusé le chef de la diplomatie française de désinformation dans un communiqué conjoint consulté par Anadolu, appelant à des mesures correctives immédiates.

Une coalition internationale rassemblant d’anciens ministres, ambassadeurs, diplomates, parlementaires et hautes personnalités publiques affirme que le ministre français de l’Europe et des Affaires étrangères, Jean-Noël Barrot, a relayé publiquement des propos «numériquement falsifiés» attribués à la Rapporteuse spéciale des Nations Unies, Francesca Albanese.

Selon la coalition, ces éléments inexacts auraient été utilisés pour discréditer une titulaire d’un mandat indépendant de l’ONU. Elle estime que «le recours à des informations manipulées porte atteinte à l’intégrité des institutions internationales», et avertit que de telles pratiques «minent la confiance dans le droit international et affaiblissent les principes de responsabilité et de transparence qui fondent la diplomatie multilatérale».

Pour rappel, le 11 février 2026, Jean-Noël Barrot a attribué à Mme Albanese des propos présentés comme issus de son intervention au Forum des médias d’Al Jazeera, tenu le 7 février 2026, allant jusqu’à appeler publiquement à sa démission.

Toutefois, une vérification indépendante des faits menée par le programme «Truth or Fake» de France 24 a établi que la rapporteuse onusienne n’avait jamais qualifié Israël d’«ennemi commun de l’humanité», contrairement aux affirmations relayées.

Dans ce contexte, Francesca Albanese a rappelé un principe central du droit international, soulignant que «l’imputabilité des violations graves du droit international constitue une obligation juridique, non un choix politique», et que «les responsables doivent être poursuivis».

Allant plus loin, la rapporteuse a mis en garde contre les conséquences de l’inaction. Elle a averti que «le défaut d’application de cette responsabilité favorise l’impunité, mine la crédibilité des protections juridiques internationales et compromet les instruments fondamentaux du droit international», citant notamment la Convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide.

Jean-Noël Barrot a maintenu mercredi, devant Assemblée nationale, sa demande de démission de la Rapporteuse spéciale de l’ONU Francesca Albanese, rejetant tout appel à une rectification de propos jugés inexacts.

Interpellé lors des questions au gouvernement par la députée LFI Andrée Taurinya, qui dénonçait une «déformation» des déclarations de la Rapporteuse spéciale, le chef de la diplomatie a défendu sa position exprimée le 11 février.

«Les fake news, ça suffit. Je n’ai ni déformé, ni tronqué les propos de Madame Albanese», a répondu Barrot dans l’hémicycle. «Je les ai tout simplement condamnés parce qu’ils sont condamnables.»

source : Agence Anadolu

2008 - Qui ? - Avec Pierre Jovanovic. (France)

Réseau International

https://youtu.be/tjE-ZSreXS8?si=eiwB9LEPJ7xp_jsI

20 février 2026

/Faouzi Oki

/1 Comment

Des corps de Palestiniens remis à leurs familles avec des organes manquants

Imprimer

Pdf

Soutenez-nous
Votre soutien nous est indispensable pour continuer à vous fournir le meilleur de l’information internationale alternative. C’est grâce à vos dons que nous pourrons maintenir le cap pour une information plurielle et réellement alternative. Nous comptons sur vous.
Participer

par Faouzi Oki

Le directeur général du ministère de la Santé à Gaza, le Dr Mounir Al-Barsh, a directement accusé l’occupation, s’interrogeant sur la source des chiffres records concernant les reins dont israël se vante à l’échelle mondiale. Dans une déclaration à la presse locale,

M. Al-Barsh a déclaré que l’occupant, qui détient les corps des martyrs palestiniens depuis des années et empêche leur remise à leurs familles, est le même qui se présente aujourd’hui au monde sous un visage humanitaire factice, parlant de solidarité et de don d’organes, tout en menant secrètement des politiques qui violent les droits humains les plus élémentaires.Il a précisé que les corps avaient été remis à leurs familles dans des cas avérés d’organes manquants, sans aucun rapport d’autopsie ni droit de poser des questions ou de demander des comptes, soulignant que les Palestiniens ne s’opposaient pas au principe du don d’organes, mais refusaient que le corps palestinien soit transformé en matière première pour l’exploitation et la propagande politique. Ajoutant que l’absence de transparence et l’interdiction de toute surveillance internationale indépendante sur ces dossiers rendent le doute légitime et font de la demande de responsabilité une nécessité morale et juridique, appelant à une enquête internationale indépendante qui révèle toute la vérité et détermine les responsabilités.

Parmi les témoignages qui renforcent ces soupçons, il convient de mentionner le cas de la victime Leith Abu Maileq, d étenu le 7 octobre 2023, puis tué et remis à sa famille dans le cadre d’un accord Tufan al-Aqsa . Malgré la remise du corps, sa mère affirme que le véritable choc n’a pas été le moment de la réception, mais l’état dans lequel le corps de son fils lui a été rendu, car elle a remarqué des traces de sutures médicalement injustifiées dans des zones sensibles du corps, sans que la famille ne reçoive aucun rapport d’autopsie ou d’explications officielles clarifiant les raisons de ces interventions.

Les soupçons soulevés au sujet du vol d’organes sur les corps des morts palestiniens ne reposent pas sur des récits individuels isolés, mais sont corroborés par une série de faits accumulés et d’indices documentés qui pris ensemble, constituent une base raisonnable pour soupçonner la commission de violations graves et systématiques.

Le premier de ces indices est la politique de rétention des corps pratiquée depuis des années par l’occupant, que ce soit dans les cimetières numérotés ou dans les morgues, une politique qui prive les familles du droit à un enterrement rapide et empêche toute supervision indépendante ou contrôle médical impartial sur ce qui arrive aux corps pendant les périodes de détention, qui peuvent s’étendre sur des mois, voire des années.

Le deuxième indicateur concerne le transfert des corps des martyrs vers les instituts de médecine légale sionistes, notamment l’institut «Abu Kabir», sans en informer les familles, sans fournir de rapports d’autopsie officiels ni préciser les raisons de ces procédures, ce qui laisse supposer des interventions médicales allant au-delà des limites habituelles de l’examen médico-légal.

Le troisième indicateur concerne la remise de corps présentant des traces de sutures injustifiées sur le plan médical ou des signes d’intervention chirurgicale, comme l’ont rapporté les familles des victimes, notamment le corps de Laith Abu Mailque , qui a affirmé que le corps avait été recousu à des endroits sensibles, sans aucune explication ni document médical.

À cela s’ajoute l’absence de rapports médicaux et d’autopsie lors de la remise des corps, et le fait que les familles soient privées de leur droit de consultation ou d’opposition, en violation flagrante des normes médicales internationales. Ces indices coïncident avec les rapports des organisations de défense des droits humains qui font état du vol d’organes spécifiques, notamment de cornées, dans des cas qui ont été recueillis, documentés et transmis aux autorités palestiniennes compétentes, en vue de les présenter devant les tribunaux internationaux comme des violations pouvant constituer des crimes de guerre.

Dans le même contexte, le contraste flagrant entre les chiffres records de dons d’organes dont se vante l’occupant au niveau international et le manque de transparence quant à la provenance de ces organes soulève des questions juridiques et éthiques légitimes, d’autant plus qu’il existe toute une catégorie de victimes palestiniennes privées de contrôle et de protection, même après leur mort.

La campagne nationale pour la récupération des corps des victimes a confirmé que l’occupation détient 776 corps aux cimetières numérotés et des morgues, parmi lesquels se trouvent des dizaines d’enfants et de prisonniers. Considérant cela comme une violation flagrante du respect des morts et un crime de guerre au sens du droit international. Elle a exigé la libération immédiate et inconditionnelle des corps des martyrs, l’arrêt de la politique de détention et l’autorisation pour les institutions internationales d’accéder aux lieux de détention et d’autopsie, affirmant que la dignité des Palestiniens, vivants ou morts, n’est pas négociable.

Ces faits font suite à l’annonce par le ministre des Affaires étrangères de l’occupation, Gideon Sa’ar, que l’entité sioniste avait établi un record mondial en matière de dons de reins, et à la célébration de cet exploit par le Guinness Book of World Records, dans un contexte qui reflète une flagrante double norme internationale, où l’occupation est récompensée pour ses réalisations humanitaires, tandis que les crimes commis contre le corps palestinien ne font l’objet d’aucune poursuite ni enquête.

Faouzi Oki

René Guiart, La lettre de la tribu.